首页> 外文OA文献 >Information on genetically modified foods and how it affects consumers: evidence from experimental auctions
【2h】

Information on genetically modified foods and how it affects consumers: evidence from experimental auctions

机译:转基因食品及其对消费者的影响的信息:实验性拍卖的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Genetically modified (GM) foods have been at the center of a contentious debate. One side of the debate includes environmental groups like Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, who are opposed to GM foods---these groups would like GM foods banned, or at the very least they want GM foods to be clearly labeled as such. On the other side of the debate are agribusiness companies like Monsanto and Syngenta, who view GM foods positively. They think GM foods help the environment and could help feed the malnourished. Both groups actively disseminate information on genetically modified foods.;This dissertation reports on several results from experimental auctions where consumers actually had to purchase food products if they won the auctions. Consumers were able to accurately read the signals for which food was GM in experimental markets that emulated mandatory and voluntary GM-labeling regimes. This shows evidence that the U.S. has been prudent in not implementing a mandatory labeling policy for GM foods. Consumers place a large value on keeping non-GM foods free from any GM-material (not allowing a small \u22tolerance\u22 for GM-material). Consumers did not place extra value, however, on a 1% tolerant food relative to a 5% tolerant food. This provides evidence that if the United States chooses a tolerance policy for GM-material, a 5% GM-tolerance may be better than a 1% tolerance.;Currently the information available to consumers on GM foods is from interested parties. Chapter 4 shows that a third party source that provides verifiable information on GM foods could have a large annual value to U.S. consumers. This value is due to helping consumers make more informed choices. Verifiable information can also have value by preventing the non-adoption of socially useful inventions.;This dissertation also shows that a majority of consumers would either trust the government, or an independent third party source for information on GM foods---so if a body is created to disseminate this information, a quasi-governmental organization may be the most trusted. This dissertation provides a look at many aspects of how information on genetically modified foods affects consumer behavior.
机译:转基因食品一直是争论的焦点。辩论的一方包括绿色和平组织和地球之友等反对转基因食品的环境组织,这些组织希望禁止转基因食品,或者至少他们希望明确标明转基因食品。辩论的另一面是孟山都和先正达等农业综合企业,他们对转基因食品持积极态度。他们认为转基因食品可以帮助环境,并有助于营养不良。两组都积极传播有关转基因食品的信息。本论文报告了一些实验性拍卖的结果,如果消费者赢得了拍卖,他们实际上必须购买食品。在模拟强制性和自愿性转基因标签制度的实验市场中,消费者能够准确地读取食品为转基因的信号。这表明有证据表明美国在不对转基因食品实施强制性标签政策方面持谨慎态度。消费者非常重视保持非转基因食品中不含任何转基因材料(不允许对转基因材料有很小的公差)。相对于5%耐性食品,消费者对1%耐性食品没有额外的价值。这提供了证据,如果美国选择对转基因材料的容忍政策,则5%的GM容忍度可能比1%的容忍度更好。;当前,消费者可从有关方面获得的有关转基因食品的信息。第4章表明,提供有关转基因食品可验证信息的第三方来源对美国消费者来说可能具有很大的年度价值。该价值归功于帮助消费者做出更明智的选择。可验证的信息也可以通过防止不采用对社会有用的发明而具有价值。该论文还表明,大多数消费者会相信政府或独立的第三方来源获得有关转基因食品的信息-因此,如果创建机构来传播此信息,准政府组织可能是最受信任的组织。本文从基因改造食品的信息如何影响消费者行为的许多方面进行了研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rousu, Matthew Christopher;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2002
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号